Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Keegan Rice vs Benjamin Gusic Wan Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Rice vs Wan analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Keegan Rice vs Benjamin Gusic Wan Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Rice 0 - 0 Wan
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Rice has won 32.05% of points on their second serve, while Wan has won 42.99%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Rice, in recent form, has won 52.94% of their opponent's second serve points, while Wan has won 40.3%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.82% and 30% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Rice has saved 51.35% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wan has saved 56.1% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Rice has won 20% of matches played (W/L 1/ 4), with Wan winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Rice has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Wan has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Rice has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 1/ 2), where as Wan has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Rice has played against opponents with an average rank of 127.2 while Wan has played against players with an average rank of 194.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Rice has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wan has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Rice has converted 57.14% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wan has converted 23.81% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
18
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
16
Age
Plays
Form
13% (1-7)
Career Total W/L
0% (0-4)
33% (1-2)
YTD W/L
0% (0-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Keegan Rice vs Benjamin Gusic Wan For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Rice VS Wan
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Keegan Rice | Benjamin Gusic Wan |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) | 0% (0/8) |
| Games Win/Loss | 35% (20/37) | 30% (21/49) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.07 | 0.06 |
| Aces Total | 2 | 2 |
| DFs per game | 0.46 | 0.44 |
| DFs Total | 13 | 15 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:26:27 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 194.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (114/192) | 53% (123/230) |
| 1st Serve W% | 55% (63/114) | 58% (71/123) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 32% (25/78) | 43% (46/107) |
| BPs Won% Total | 57% (8/14) | 24% (5/21) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (66/163) | 33% (75/227) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (3/1) | 0% (4/0) |
Keegan Rice Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Michiel De Krom
Player
Keegan Rice
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Keegan Rice
Player
Filip Apltauer
65%
(
62 of
96)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
1
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
100%
(
8 of
8)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
49%
(
47 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
45 of
82)
94
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Keegan Rice
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve %
49%
(
25 of
51)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tatsuma Ito
Player
Keegan Rice
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
51%
(
43 of
84)
4
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
1
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
42 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Keegan Rice
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
74%
(
35 of
47)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Benjamin Gusic Wan Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Tobias Smoliner
Player
Benjamin Gusic Wan
78%
(
58 of
74)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
32%
(
24 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robert Strombachs
Player
Benjamin Gusic Wan
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
49%
(
29 of
59)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Constantin Bittoun Kouzmine
Player
Benjamin Gusic Wan
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Martyn Pawelski
Player
Benjamin Gusic Wan
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
45%
(
23 of
51)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 3-6 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Rice Vs Wan Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Rice are available here and Wan photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
